|
||||||||||
 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
This is an unofficial archive site only. It is no longer maintained.
You can not post comments. You can not make an account. Your email
will not be read. Please read this
page or the footnote if you have questions. |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
I was hoping to see... (5.00 / 2) (#1) |
|
by Ernest Bludger on Tue Apr 9th, 2002 at 10:40:48 PM PST |
|
|
|
either Sonny Bono or Margaret Thatcher on the poll. |
|
Maggie... (none / 0) (#18) |
|
by because it isnt on Fri Apr 12th, 2002 at 07:15:48 AM PST |
|
|
|
...was politically assassinated, but she's not an assassinated politician. Not yet. adequacy.org -- because it isn't |
|
Is Princess fuggin' Diana innit. (2.50 / 2) (#2) |
|
by because it isnt on Wed Apr 10th, 2002 at 02:50:19 AM PST |
|
|
|
She was fuggin' assassinaded 'cos de fuggin' Briddish establishment didn't want no fuggin' Egyptian blood in de fuggin' royal family. Thad Duke o' fuggin' Edinbruh planned it all -- fuggin' Greek. adequacy.org -- because it isn't |
|
Look beneath the hype to find the truth. (5.00 / 3) (#3) |
|
by dmg on Wed Apr 10th, 2002 at 06:50:06 AM PST |
|
|
|
Diana served her purpose, giving the nation two heirs to the throne. She then went off with a Muslim man with shady connections. Some time later she is involved in a terrible car crash which coincidentally solved two royal problems in one go. Charles is now free to marry Camilla, and the Royal heirs will not have a Muslim 'uncle'. You don't have to be a paranoid nutcase to suspect that there is more to this than meets the eye... I am risking my life even posting this information. time to give a Newtonian demonstration - of a bullet, its mass and its acceleration. -- MC Hawking |
|
As has been said before (2.00 / 3) (#4) |
|
by because it isnt on Wed Apr 10th, 2002 at 07:00:10 AM PST |
|
|
|
Charles is now free to marry Camilla Charles is not "free" to marry Camilla. Camilla is Catholic. Charles, and the entire British monarchy since Henry VIII, is founded on Protestantism. If Charles marries Camilla, he rules himself out of monarch duty. Furthermore, Diana was killed in a car crash because her driver (employer: M. Fayed) was drunk and speeding, and the stupid tart wasn't wearing her seat-belt. Coincidentally, the only person who survived that 100mph crash into a concrete wall was the only person wearing a seat-belt. The moral of this story? Wear your seat belt and don't drink 'n' drive. adequacy.org -- because it isn't |
|
Hmm... (4.00 / 2) (#6) |
|
by Narcissus on Wed Apr 10th, 2002 at 08:22:13 AM PST |
|
|
|
It looks to me that what your saying is that you don't have to worry about drinking and driving because if you wear your seat belt you'll live anyways ... I think your priorities are �buggered? up ... I don't know what the hell that means but it looks funny -------------------------------- Ok, who picked the flower??? |
|
Priorities. (3.00 / 1) (#7) |
|
by because it isnt on Wed Apr 10th, 2002 at 08:29:02 AM PST |
|
|
|
It looks to me that what your saying is that you don't have to worry about drinking and driving because if you wear your seat belt you'll live anyways Well, the guy who lived through that crash was on life support for a few weeks. It's not nice, but it's better than being dead. So if you don't mind the minor setback of hospitalisation and potential permanent disability, you can safely drink and drive while wearing your seat-belt. adequacy.org -- because it isn't |
|
Read on (5.00 / 2) (#10) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Wed Apr 10th, 2002 at 11:55:25 AM PST |
|
|
|
More info on Princess Diana is here. Be warned, Icke is a highly controversial person, and you may feel uncomfortable with what he has to say. Its possible that he is misinformed, or worse still, a raving paranoid lunatic. However, even if 5% of what he says is true, we are all in very deep shit. |
|
Icke website (4.00 / 1) (#5) |
|
by Uncanny Vortex on Wed Apr 10th, 2002 at 08:14:27 AM PST |
|
|
|
Dmg, thanks much for the link. I greatly enjoyed the informative articles from David Icke. It is enlightening to realize that all our presidents so far have been reptilian shapeshifters, who drink the blood of babies and small children. I have been in the dark on this for far too long.
-- Uncanny Vortex |
|
Icke. (5.00 / 1) (#8) |
|
by because it isnt on Wed Apr 10th, 2002 at 08:32:03 AM PST |
|
|
|
Icke is crown prince of Adequacy.org. adequacy.org -- because it isn't |
|
Dianna (4.00 / 1) (#12) |
|
by Ravzilla on Wed Apr 10th, 2002 at 05:56:02 PM PST |
|
|
|
Good thing the hoe died, she was getting old and ugly, the papers would have got bored of her soon enough. Then she would be as pathetic as the Queen Mother!! dj Ravzilla: bringin the rawest tunes to u!! |
|
Request for Interview (none / 0) (#21) |
|
by John Milton on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 10:15:24 PM PST |
|
|
|
Hey, dmg! Do you think one of the editors could swing an interview with Icke. He seems like such a nice Christian man. -John Milton |
|
When posting a quote (none / 0) (#9) |
|
by zeebillbi on Wed Apr 10th, 2002 at 11:13:59 AM PST |
|
|
|
When posting a quote, please be sure to inform us of who you're quoting (in this case, Private Eye's CD-ROMP). After all, Adequacy.org is not home to intellectual property thieves, unlike certain other sites. |
|
Damn straight. (5.00 / 1) (#13) |
|
by because it isnt on Thu Apr 11th, 2002 at 05:04:57 AM PST |
|
|
|
I think the actual quote is "Goin' down... just like me. Loosin' fuggin' money all the fuggin' time. Hey darkie! You're fired! You know who shot Princess Diana? The Duke o fuggin' Edinburgh -- fuggin' Greek". So it's nothing like a quote. It's a pastiche of the Eye's regular coverage of the owner of the humourous magazine Punch.
Be glad I didn't mention the conspiracy between the Duke of Edinburgh and the Corgis. adequacy.org -- because it isn't |
|
Error of omission (5.00 / 1) (#11) |
|
by ICS Dempsey KBE on Wed Apr 10th, 2002 at 02:12:31 PM PST |
|
|
|
I place my vote for St. Thomas � Becket. |
|
no good choices (4.50 / 2) (#14) |
|
by foon on Thu Apr 11th, 2002 at 01:08:23 PM PST |
|
|
|
*Abraham Lincoln
Opposed the values of the founding fathers and destroyed the consitution. Deserved what he got. *John F. Kennedy Maybe the best choice. A courageous fighter against Communism, and contrary to what you might expect from a liberalist, he lowered taxes and increased military spending. But he stole an election from Nixon, an even more responsible anti-communist, was a front for the Mafia, and did not give proper support to the attempted liberation of Cuba. Being a papalist also doesn't help his case. *Moammar Gadhafi's daughter Collateral damage. Gadhafi supports terrorism, and the bombing of Tripoli was totally justified on those grounds. *Anwar Sadat Another terrorist sympathizer. Did sign a piece agreement with Israel, but just in order to buy time and get US aid in order to further his cause of driving Israel into the sea. *Ethel and Julius Rosenburg Communist spies, plain and simple. Deserved what they got. They were not assinated, they were legally executed after being found guilty under United States law of conspiracy. *Patrice Lumumba Communist sympathizer, known subversive. Mobutu was a far more responsible leader. *Spencer Percival *Alan Berg Huh? Probably commies though *Yitzhak Rabin As we can see from present events, negotiating with the terrorist Arabs is a dead end. *Princess Diana Proof of the moral decadence of the once-great homeland of the proud Anglo-Saxon race. I would offer another choice: Benito Mussolini. True, the association with Hitler and Nazism does cast somewhat of a tarnish on his proud rule. But his policies made Italy into a modern society, while crushing subversion and bringing order. I don't think any post-war government in Italy has lasted more than about a year, Mussolini could have provided much-needed stability for Italy as they recovered from the war. |
|
Fascist scum. (n/t) (none / 0) (#16) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Thu Apr 11th, 2002 at 09:07:40 PM PST |
|
|
|
|
Alan Berg (none / 0) (#22) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Mon Apr 15th, 2002 at 06:19:10 AM PST |
|
|
|
Jewish radio talk show host in Denver, was gunned down by members of "The Order", a white supremacist organization, in June of 1984. RaHoWa! |
|
I didn't vote. (4.50 / 2) (#15) |
|
by Slubberdegullion on Thu Apr 11th, 2002 at 08:19:53 PM PST |
|
|
|
I didn't vote, as there is no option for Archduke Ferdinand. |
|
Damn Straight (5.00 / 2) (#17) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Apr 12th, 2002 at 07:13:03 AM PST |
|
|
|
No Archduke, no vote! |
|
jesus (none / 0) (#19) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Apr 12th, 2002 at 12:09:00 PM PST |
|
|
|
jesus is my favorite assassinated politician cause come on hes the son of god and all and messanger of all that is mighty and righteous and fuzzy too!! dammit |
|
hey retard (none / 0) (#20) |
|
by tkatchev on Fri Apr 12th, 2002 at 12:51:05 PM PST |
|
|
|
which part of the phrase "politician" do you not understand?
go back to fucking grade school, k? -- Peace and much love... |
|
now whose right? (none / 0) (#23) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Tue Apr 16th, 2002 at 09:14:41 AM PST |
|
|
|
maybe you dont realise that religion is just as much a political power as any other organization. Christianity is one of, if not the most powerful political institution in the world. when you look at it Christian politics influence us in many ways.... just look at George W. he voted against stem cell research simply based on his religion.
now who needs to go back to grade school??? |
|
shut up already (none / 0) (#24) |
|
by tkatchev on Tue Apr 16th, 2002 at 10:49:28 AM PST |
|
|
|
nobody wants you here, loser. -- Peace and much love... |
|
why should i care what you say (none / 0) (#25) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Tue Apr 16th, 2002 at 11:47:39 AM PST |
|
|
|
you havent backed anyhing you have said... and if they dont want my post here they can take it off. but until then you can just ignore me because i wont be quiet |
|
you shouldn't (none / 0) (#26) |
|
by tkatchev on Tue Apr 16th, 2002 at 12:51:47 PM PST |
|
|
|
so shut up already. the world hates you, loser. go crawl somewhere and die, k? -- Peace and much love... |
|
you have misunderstood religion (none / 0) (#27) |
|
by nathan on Tue Apr 16th, 2002 at 01:09:24 PM PST |
|
|
|
Bush's motivations are not religious, but rather partly superstition and partly crass appeasement of powerful interests. Nathan -- Li'l Sis: Yo, that's a real grey area. Even by my lax standards. |
|
Summary (none / 0) (#31) |
|
by because it isnt on Thu Apr 18th, 2002 at 06:23:27 AM PST |
|
|
|
Religion is not politics; politics is not religion. Occasionally, one pretends to be the other, as the bear sometimes has to be like the fox, and the fox sometimes has to act the bear. adequacy.org -- because it isn't |
|
you know, (none / 0) (#32) |
|
by nathan on Thu Apr 18th, 2002 at 10:51:31 AM PST |
|
|
|
I always had a hard time figuring out Jesus' position on capital gains tax. Nathan -- Li'l Sis: Yo, that's a real grey area. Even by my lax standards. |
|
Jesus' position on capital gains tax. (none / 0) (#33) |
|
by because it isnt on Thu Apr 18th, 2002 at 11:12:36 AM PST |
|
|
|
I thought it was "Give unto Caeser what is Caeser's". adequacy.org -- because it isn't |
|
you miss what i was getting at (none / 0) (#36) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Apr 19th, 2002 at 08:31:55 AM PST |
|
|
|
superistition is religion, and i plays into his politics...
but thats not my point im just trying to show how religion plays its role heavily in politics and you can find examples in everything such as the constitution and so on. |
|
I didn't miss anything (none / 0) (#38) |
|
by nathan on Sat Apr 20th, 2002 at 11:42:27 AM PST |
|
|
|
Superstition is not religion at all. It's a kind of primitive natural sciences. At this point, your idea of religion does not appear to be sophisticated. I ask you to desist from your linguistic terrorism and to spell, capitalise, and think properly before making your next post. Nathan -- Li'l Sis: Yo, that's a real grey area. Even by my lax standards. |
|
Ha ha, you miss. (none / 0) (#39) |
|
by tkatchev on Sat Apr 20th, 2002 at 12:43:35 PM PST |
|
|
|
Next time, aim more carefully. :)) -- Peace and much love... |
|
you miss (none / 0) (#40) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Sun Apr 21st, 2002 at 01:32:58 AM PST |
|
|
|
superstition is religious because it is based on faith; as is every religion. just because you dont want to title it as a religion is fine by me. as far as spelling and capitalization goes i dont care at all because what i say here, in short doesnt matter to me |
|
correction (none / 0) (#41) |
|
by tkatchev on Sun Apr 21st, 2002 at 01:55:46 AM PST |
|
|
|
you dont matter period so please leave and stop fouling up the electrons (ether whatever) nobody wants you here nobody needs you you are redundant and useless so please leave us normal people alone thank you for not staying here longer than necessary bye thanks -- Peace and much love... |
|
if you speak only to provoke (none / 0) (#42) |
|
by nathan on Sun Apr 21st, 2002 at 01:24:09 PM PST |
|
|
|
Then you are a foul subhuman troll and you should be IP-banned. Nathan -- Li'l Sis: Yo, that's a real grey area. Even by my lax standards. |
|
He doesn't 'speak', obviously, (none / 0) (#43) |
|
by because it isnt on Mon Apr 22nd, 2002 at 02:35:14 AM PST |
|
|
|
he writes. I have impeccable spelling and grammar. Let's ban programming and eat babies. adequacy.org -- because it isn't |
|
How dope can one be? (none / 0) (#44) |
|
by Uncanny Vortex on Mon Apr 22nd, 2002 at 09:20:16 AM PST |
|
|
|
I have impeccable spelling and grammar. Mine are also impeccable, though slightly more impeccable than yours. Let's ban programming and eat babies. Right on, fool! Word. I am absolutely fed up with writing software all day, every day. Let's eat baby squirrels and baby cows. (I assume you meant baby animals, not baby humans. In the latter case I retract my "right on" exclamation.) -- Uncanny Vortex |
|
Clarification. (none / 0) (#51) |
|
by because it isnt on Tue Apr 23rd, 2002 at 02:13:53 AM PST |
|
|
|
I assume you meant baby animals, not baby humans. I meant baby humans. And we should give all kids their own guns, rockets and bombs. Except if they're hackers, obviously. adequacy.org -- because it isn't |
|
Eating human babies. (5.00 / 1) (#52) |
|
by tkatchev on Tue Apr 23rd, 2002 at 12:49:04 PM PST |
|
|
|
In liberalese, I think it's called "stem cell research".
-- Peace and much love... |
|
its me again (none / 0) (#35) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Apr 19th, 2002 at 08:28:38 AM PST |
|
|
|
once any of you can prove to me that christianity doesnt screw with politics today i will believe you. also i would like you to prove to me that catholasism has nothing to do with money and what not, i will believe you. because in my opinion christianity is the single most dominate political force today and controls many many peoples lives, with dogma, and priests telling them how to believe... that they have to change to understand that they have to believe in certain way to get the picture. |
|
git! (none / 0) (#37) |
|
by tkatchev on Fri Apr 19th, 2002 at 11:59:04 PM PST |
|
|
|
i thought i told to to get out of here, no? you have a problem with reading comprehension, yes? -- Peace and much love... |
|
bin Laden (3.66 / 3) (#28) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Tue Apr 16th, 2002 at 05:59:13 PM PST |
|
|
|
I'm sure if Osama Bin Laden were actually assassinated and actually a politician, he would be winning this thing! |
|
What happened to... (none / 0) (#29) |
|
by gohomeandshoveit on Wed Apr 17th, 2002 at 06:02:58 PM PST |
|
|
|
Yitzhak Rabin? I voted for him, but he is nowhere to seen. :-(
|
|
Yitzhak Rabin was removed because (none / 0) (#45) |
|
by Needs Sleep on Mon Apr 22nd, 2002 at 10:05:37 AM PST |
|
|
|
The editors here are muslim bastards.
When us Jews stick for our rights (and guns) and defend ourselves from merciless suicide bombers by killing a few Palestinians, the muslims become outraged, and decide to wipe out any memory of Israeli leaders. You are all anti semitic pricks, and when the day of Judgement comes, God will check if you are circumcised. And if the little head below isn't trimmed, he will make sure that the larger head above will be chopped. Bah. |
|
Correct. (none / 0) (#46) |
|
by tkatchev on Mon Apr 22nd, 2002 at 10:18:23 AM PST |
|
|
|
Except replace the word "God" in your post with "Baal".
Remember the thing about the "golden calf"? -- Peace and much love... |
|
WTF??? (none / 0) (#30) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Thu Apr 18th, 2002 at 05:57:00 AM PST |
|
|
|
Not to be catty, but this poll makes the Slashdot polls (which I feel are a waste of bandwidth) look carefully planned and relevant.
I mean, come on... |
|
A better poll would be... (none / 0) (#47) |
|
by Uncanny Vortex on Mon Apr 22nd, 2002 at 11:10:00 AM PST |
|
|
|
...who is your favorite assinated politician?
Assinated would refer to someone who takes (or gives) it up the ass. On second thought, (nearly) all politicians stick it to the populace in "Assinator" fashion. Perhaps the best poll idea would be "By whom do you enjoy being Assinated the most?" For me, the answer to that is clear: Abraham Lincoln. -- Uncanny Vortex ("Give it to me straight, Honest Abe!") |
|
Sir, (none / 0) (#48) |
|
by tkatchev on Mon Apr 22nd, 2002 at 11:57:24 AM PST |
|
|
|
What is your problem?
Perhaps it has something to do with your father? -- Peace and much love... |
|
Indeed. (none / 0) (#49) |
|
by Uncanny Vortex on Mon Apr 22nd, 2002 at 12:07:59 PM PST |
|
|
|
Perhaps it has something to do with your father? My problem has everything to do with my father, who strongly resembled Lincoln and perpetrated brutal sodomization on my young male person quite often -- reciting Lincoln's writings from memory all the while. -- Uncanny Vortex |
|
Yeah, that's what I thought. (none / 0) (#50) |
|
by tkatchev on Mon Apr 22nd, 2002 at 12:33:55 PM PST |
|
|
|
Have a nice day. -- Peace and much love... |
|
Some missing persons (none / 0) (#53) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Wed Apr 24th, 2002 at 11:49:35 AM PST |
|
|
|
Mahatma Ghandi
Indira Ghandi Martin Luther King Lord Mountbatten of Burma Archduke Ferdinand |
|
Olof Palme (none / 0) (#54) |
|
by Anonymous Reader on Wed Apr 24th, 2002 at 01:44:36 PM PST |
|
|
|
- swedish prime minister assasinated on his way home from the movies February 28, 1986
Known (and loved and hated) for his leftist viewpoints his death threw Sweden into schock. The killer has not been found. |
 |
Stories
111 votes - 17 %
