Adequacy front page
Stories Diaries Polls Users
Google

Web Adequacy.org
Home About Topics Rejects Abortions
This is an unofficial archive site only. It is no longer maintained. You can not post comments. You can not make an account. Your email will not be read. Please read this page or the footnote if you have questions.
Poll
Sexiest Editor
shoeboy 13%
jsm 8%
elby 2%
dmg 2%
perdida 41%
nakedAC 2%
bc 5%
TheReverand 2%
osm 2%
Adam Rightman 16%

Votes: 36

 Lovers Arrival, The

 Author:  Topic:  Posted:
Sep 28, 2001
 Comments:

Ah Margot, the wee Scottish lass from Bangor, Maine.

Before she arrived I was listening to Joy Division, after she left I put on Parliament Funkadelic. Draw your own conclusions.

Poll: Who is the sexiest editor on this site?

diaries

More diaries by Peter Johnson
Psycho Ex Girlfriends
Looking for pain in all the wrong places
You win some, you lose some
Blue
Sermon On The Mount
Moods for moderns
Under the Bridge
The Width Of A Circle
A Shocking Discovery
A Woman Waits For Me?
there is no god but shoeboy
Gimme Danger
Breasts
Girlfriend is better
Happy birthday to me
Like A Virgin
Silencing The Aryan King
Microsoft
Should I make the switch to OS X?
New Adequacy.org Feature
Girlfriend is better



No challenge. (2.33 / 3) (#1)
by jelerial on Fri Sep 28th, 2001 at 02:21:40 PM PST
Perdida is by far. She's brilliant, has a knowledge of the entire world, and most importantly, is a socialist. Please show your support, and vote 'perdida!'


perdida = COMMUNISM (2.66 / 3) (#2)
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Sep 28th, 2001 at 05:17:36 PM PST
He who would vote for perdida would also vote for Joe Stalin.

Remember that!


shoeboy == MORMONISM (2.66 / 3) (#9)
by Anonymous Reader on Fri Sep 28th, 2001 at 10:35:33 PM PST



 
awwww!! *BLUSH* (5.00 / 1) (#3)
by perdida on Fri Sep 28th, 2001 at 05:50:36 PM PST
You are a sweetie!!

Thanks!!!

You host us, so you are the sexiest by far imo. :))




This is what democracy looks like

 
Hmm (5.00 / 2) (#4)
by spacejack on Fri Sep 28th, 2001 at 06:18:52 PM PST
Before she arrived I was listening to Joy Division, after she left I put on Parliament Funkadelic. Draw your own conclusions.

You came to your senses?

When push comes to shovin,
I'd rather make some lovin.



 
And this is "statistically meaningful" h (none / 0) (#5)
by chloedancer on Fri Sep 28th, 2001 at 06:36:58 PM PST
Given how little I know about the editors of this site (and how the definition of "sexy" can vary significantly based upon any number of traits as well as to the preferences and values of each of us individually) how on earth can you expect any meaningful result? To improve the odds of an informed choice by all, I offer what little I know for consideration:

RE: bc - While I'm on record as describing him as being "cute," this is completely untrue. I loathe that word, actually, and would never use it to describe this specific person because it would be demeaning (I suspect, however, that the person responsible for that misinterpretation also had this in mind). It has since been clarified that I did, in fact, remark that bc is "stunning," but the yet-undisclosed follow-up phrase that came to mind was actually "mouth-watering" (make of that what you will; I am unashamed.) He's brilliant, charming, funny, chivalrous, etc., and I am aware of the fact that he writes better than I could ever dream to. I could go on, but I won't - I suspect that he blushes easily and wouldn't ever want to cause him discomfort of any sort. If I were to compare him to any known personages, I'd say his features are classic in a Cary Grant/young Sean Connery sense -- plus he also has a smile that promises all the fun you could wish for that is wonderfully inviting.

RE: Perdida - I believe I've seen a photo of the lady and, in a word, she is beautiful -- in the archetypical, "Golden Mean" sense of the word, the "we mere mortals aren't worthy to gaze upon your countenance" kind of beautiful. Her intelligence is of a level I'd describe as "genius" (and I've met a few, so I think I'm capable of recognizing them at this point in my personal evolution). She uses words with surgical precision to express exactly what she wishes; I am in awe of her clarity of thought and the consistent quality of her writing. She has an air of being utterly unattainable which, of course, makes her all the more desirable; my impression is that she's cool and passionate simultaneously. In my mind, I she's a cross between Audrey Hepburn and Mother Jones (the composite including only the best facets of each, of course!).

And then there's Peter Johnson. The first time I ever laid eyes upon him, the phrase that popped to mind almost immediately was "lady-killer"; the follow-up was "What an arrogant SOB!" and the general vibe was a horrified "Oh, God - he actually thinks he's God's gift to women!" This was followed genuine relief when I then realized that he's almost the perfect antithesis of what generally passes as being "my type" (he is taller than me, but then again, I'm only 5'2"). I also, based on experience, subscribe to a long-held theory that all fair-haired men are generally psychotic (and he qualifies on both counts). In the interim, I've discovered that he's a self-described narcissist, that he's as stubborn about his opinions as the day is long, and that he has the nerve to take pride in being absolutely infuriating whenever possible. While the literary quality of his postings is often inconsistent, he gets points in my book for paying attention to the subtle nuances and even I will admit that he's a true master of wordplay (but this is often diminished by the fact that most of his humor can best be appreciated by pre-pubescent boys). I could go on, but he'd probably love me for it.

But I also know these things to be true about Shoeboy: I've been lucky enough to witness how his eyes change with his mood. He is capable of being amazingly delightful when he wishes to be, devilish grin firmly in place. And I can only describe the few times I've been privileged enough to glimpse him without his emotional armor intact as "breathtaking."

Oh, I get it. This is supposed to be subjective! Guess who gets my vote? ;)


For the record (3.50 / 2) (#6)
by Peter Johnson on Fri Sep 28th, 2001 at 08:52:00 PM PST
I <b>am</b> God's gift to women. I thank my maker daily for not including the receipt.
--Peter
Are you adequate?

And you're obviously (5.00 / 1) (#7)
by chloedancer on Fri Sep 28th, 2001 at 09:01:12 PM PST
flustered enough to post in plain text mode, m'friend. Gotcha!


 
You need to get out more... (5.00 / 1) (#11)
by tkatchev on Sat Sep 29th, 2001 at 02:10:15 AM PST
"Sexy" is a term usually applied to real people. (As opposed to online personalities you've never seen.) I suggest you take a walk in your local park or mall -- maybe you'll see a real-life human female. (Or male, whatever.) I think the radiation from your monitor is finally getting to your head.


--
Peace and much love...




 

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ® 2001, 2002, 2003 Adequacy.org. The Adequacy.org name, logo, symbol, and taglines "News for Grown-Ups", "Most Controversial Site on the Internet", "Linux Zealot", and "He just loves Open Source Software", and the RGB color value: D7D7D7 are trademarks of Adequacy.org. No part of this site may be republished or reproduced in whatever form without prior written permission by Adequacy.org and, if and when applicable, prior written permission by the contributing author(s), artist(s), or user(s). Any inquiries are directed to legal@adequacy.org.