Adequacy front page
Stories Diaries Polls Users
Google

Web Adequacy.org
Home About Topics Rejects Abortions
This is an unofficial archive site only. It is no longer maintained. You can not post comments. You can not make an account. Your email will not be read. Please read this page or the footnote if you have questions.
Poll
Nuup
Deluded liberalist moron 12%
Linux using IP thief 31%
Inadequate left-wing whinger 0%
All of the above 56%

Votes: 16

 Liberalist morons strike again.

 Author:  Topic:  Posted:
Apr 13, 2002
 Comments:
I don't suppose any of you will have seen this idiotic diary over at that well known liberalist paradise.

According to 'Nuup' adequacy.org "cannot be for real".

diaries

More diaries by dmg
I just love those crazy Brits.
My life is one long vacation
Where to drink in London ?
A law that is ignored is not a good law.
So what are you saying, my Art is not good enough ?
The Politics of Envy
Modern Literary Masterpiece
Rock and Roll !
Adequacy. Can we make it even better ?
What do you think of adequacy ?
I miss Linux Zealot (tm)
The don't make 'em like they used to.
Is this the kind of leader the USA supports ?
What makes Australian women so hot?
Worried about all the trolls on K5 ?
PsychoKinesis - Spooky or what ?
The Litigious States of America.
The Wankometer
Attention! Slashdot retards and K5 wankers read this now!
British lack of self-control. Why are they so arrogant ?
What will the lunix apologists make of this ?
Citizen Corps and TIPS - do they go far enough ?
America's public image
Where are they now ?
Which firearm are you ?
Surprising obscure facts.
Trolling - A thing of the past ?
The War on Terror - is it winnable ?
Interesting people.
How can we take Blair seriously ?
I am now a 31337 h4x0r !!!
Nuup goes on to misrepresent adequacy.org:

instead of just wanting to debate, stay opened minded, and possibly educate themselves, they want to impose their shared views upon the lives of others.

He then goes on to steal our IP by quoting vast chunks of copyrighted adequacy material without our permission, proving that if you scratch a liberalist, you will find a thief.

The question is what can be done about this ?


Shame on you... (none / 0) (#1)
by First Incision on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 08:45:44 AM PST
...You made me read something on Kuro5hin.

It amazes me how people like this take such pains to drone on about how they support free speech and the voicing of controversial opinions.

And of course, instead of posting some of the more inane things you will find on this site, he simply cites some opinions he with which he just happens to disagree. Oooh! These opinions can't possibly be for real because they don't fall in lockstep with my preconceived notions!

He may have a point with the overabundant "read the Bible you semiliterate liberalist" posts. I also tire of these. But oddly, that's not the main focus of his complaints.

What can be done about this? Continue to exist and discuss. Nothing could possibly irk him more.
_
_
Do you suffer from late-night hacking? Ask your doctor about Protonix.

Since I believe in objective experimental data... (none / 0) (#2)
by tkatchev on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 09:04:21 AM PST
...you will stop existing when I close my eyes.

:))


--
Peace and much love...

I hate Berkeley (none / 0) (#6)
by ausduck on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 01:50:11 PM PST
Don't you trust anyone to do your obsevring for you?

Theoretically, (none / 0) (#7)
by tkatchev on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 02:29:41 PM PST
"they" do not exist either.


--
Peace and much love...

Peer review... (5.00 / 1) (#8)
by The Mad Scientist on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 04:53:01 PM PST
...suggests your theory is wrong.

There are reasons why scientific approach is clearly superior to babbling philosophy.


Arrogant Liberalist! (5.00 / 1) (#10)
by gzt on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 05:37:02 PM PST
What is the scientific approach and why should I trust it?

What does it mean for a theory to be confirmed by its predictions?

And what are these reasons, besides that it allows you to smugly claim that other people exist? It's not so clear to me, pilgrim.


 
Thank you. (none / 0) (#17)
by hauntedattics on Sun Apr 14th, 2002 at 07:28:34 AM PST
My day has been made, thanks to your sig.



 
There's only one thing to do, then (none / 0) (#3)
by T Reginald Gibbons on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 09:21:16 AM PST
Batten down the mizzenmast, mateys! The enemy trumpeted his warcry, prepare for incoming debate! Soon he'll be engaging us with full argumentation! Though we be becalmed today, tomorrow we shall certainly be tossed and capsized upon the winds of his mighty hurricane of logic unleashed! Will we weather the coming blast of reason? Or will our saucy ship of controversy be thrown onto the rocks of liberal orthodoxy?

 
Silly Liberalist! (5.00 / 1) (#4)
by gzt on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 09:24:11 AM PST
What he doesn't realize is that what he calls 'debate' is uninteresting, worthless, and irrelevant. Indeed, his 'debate' has nothing to do with open-minded rational discourse. Instead, it is two (or more) close-minded intentionally ignorant braggarts whipping each other in their little liberalist la-la-land without pausing to think or even read. Instead of educating themselves, their dogmatism forces them to do point-by-point rebuttals and miss the main idea of the whole bloody article. What he's really saying is, "I can't defeat them in debate, even though my preferred form of idiocy is the best."

Of course, the adequate already know this, so I'm preaching to the preachers.

Cheers,
GZ

 
I think this web page says it best. (5.00 / 1) (#5)
by dmg on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 09:40:38 AM PST
The mind of the liberal is literally shut off to logic and facts.

Read this page, it contains an extremely good introduction to the liberalist phenomenon.

time to give a Newtonian demonstration - of a bullet, its mass and its acceleration.
-- MC Hawking

What's the saying (none / 0) (#16)
by Ben Reid on Sun Apr 14th, 2002 at 07:04:54 AM PST
"Don't confuse me with facts, my mind is made up."

 
is it time to bring out the hackers? [nt] (2.00 / 1) (#9)
by PotatoError on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 05:25:24 PM PST

<<JUMP! POGO POGO POGO BOUNCE! POGO POGO POGO>>

 
oh the contradiction (1.20 / 5) (#11)
by detikon on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 08:54:44 PM PST
He then goes on to steal our IP by quoting vast chunks of copyrighted adequacy material without our permission, proving that if you scratch a liberalist, you will find a thief.

Amazingly enough you all still hold onto this dream that one day Adequacy.org will one day be taken seriously as a news site. However, when similar sites or actual news sites quote information from Adequacy.org you condemn their actions. Ever think that (and the fact that this site is full of dribble infested writing by various "authors" such as Yoshi) is what's holding this site back?

Do you really think that CNN, BBC, or even AOL get all up in arms everytime another news organisation reports "according to a report from [insert news organisation here]"? Wonder why you'll never see sites such as TheRegister reporting a retraction statement or apologizing to the editors of Adequacy.org? Because it's not a news site. It's a discussion site and nothing more. You can claim that it is runs by some mega corporation and that you are all porfessionals that work together but no one buys it.

A few seconds out of your day to check the domain registration of Adequacy.org would probably surprise you. Not only is this site not registered to any organisation, the registrant Jay Elby (elby) doesn't even bother providing factual information. You can deny it all you want to but we all know that elby does not live in the Beverley Hills zip code of 90210. We also know that there is no one in that area with a telephone number of +1 234 yadda, yadda, yadda.




Go away or I will replace you with a very small shell script.

 
Stealing IPs? Again? (5.00 / 1) (#12)
by nx01 on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 11:33:28 PM PST
He then goes on to steal our IP by quoting vast chunks of copyrighted adequacy material without our permission, proving that if you scratch a liberalist, you will find a thief.

Damnit. I thought we had patched the IP-Token issue up! It seems those wiley Linux hackers must have some way to circumvent The Adequacy's DMCA-Protected Anti-IP-Stealing measures.

Perhaps the legal department should look into suing and writing C&D letters. In the meantime, I'd suggest enabling per-post IP Cloaking.

[IP TOKEN CLOAKING: ON]


"Every time I look at the X window system, it's so fucking stupid; and part of me feels responsible for the worst parts of it."
-- James Gosling

hehe (none / 0) (#13)
by detikon on Sat Apr 13th, 2002 at 11:51:09 PM PST
I'm not going to examine the idiocy of you believing there is such as thing as IP Tokens. However, I will mention this.

You seem to be having trouble figuring out the difference between the 2 uses for the acronym IP. Get back to me when you can figure out the difference between Internet Protocol (IP and Intellectual Property (IP).




Go away or I will replace you with a very small shell script.

You get back to us (none / 0) (#14)
by jvance on Sun Apr 14th, 2002 at 12:52:34 AM PST
when you learn how to match up parentheses.

[IP TOKEN CLOAKING: ON]
--
Adequacy has turned into a cesspool consisting of ... blubbering, superstitious fools arguing with smug, pseudointellectual assholes. -AR

simple typo (none / 0) (#15)
by detikon on Sun Apr 14th, 2002 at 02:53:25 AM PST
I know perfectly well how to match up parentheses. Oh no, I forgot one. You chould really check the time of the post before you go off ranting and raving. Also I suggest that you take into account that it's PST. Now, I could search through all of your posts to try and find some late night ramblings but I won't. Frankly I would love to see how you post after spending most of the night wandering around town hanging out in bars drinking scotch/whiskey/piss water beer listening to drunk Japanese investors on stage trying to sing along to old Aerosmith tunes.

Oh well at least it better than the time ********* sent a bunch of wide eyed MCSEs to talk about network infrastructure. I could have had a more intelligent conversation with my dog.




Go away or I will replace you with a very small shell script.

LINUX USER THRESHOLD REACHED! (none / 0) (#18)
by Anonymous Reader on Sun Apr 14th, 2002 at 10:46:49 AM PST
Did it hurt?

Shut up, Elenchos. (none / 0) (#19)
by The Mad Scientist on Sun Apr 14th, 2002 at 12:15:08 PM PST
Like you never done a typo.

Besides lost bracket is a harmless thing that gets discovered at compile time. Semantical errors are much more perilous.


I think this could be a breakthrough. (4.50 / 2) (#20)
by elenchos on Sun Apr 14th, 2002 at 11:51:17 PM PST
You seem to have transferred your obsession with Micro-Soft to an obsession with me. Where before you thought that every evil in life was the fault of that soft-ware company, now you react to every perceived slight and injustice as if it were the fault of elenchos, me. This might seem like a step backwards to even worse delusions, but it is actually a normal and healthy stage of the theraputic process.

Our next step will be for you to realize that it isn't really me you have so much anger about, and it was never this Micro-Soft. It is your father who you have repressed your feelings about, and we are coming very close to the time when you will be able to admit that honestly.

This is a critical time. You might feel a loss of control, and certainly a lot of shame. Who wouldn't? But realize that all this pain is part of the healing process.

Now, let's talk about your childhood once more, shall we?


I do, I do, I do
--Bikini Kill

Refutation: you're just like Sigmund Freud (none / 0) (#21)
by because it isnt on Mon Apr 15th, 2002 at 10:35:31 AM PST
but only in the sense that you tarnish the good work of actual psychologists.
adequacy.org -- because it isn't

There's more to that than you think (5.00 / 3) (#22)
by jvance on Mon Apr 15th, 2002 at 11:39:57 AM PST
Remember the Hypermints article? In one of the comments he stated that he had powdered and snorted some Hypermints tablets. Classic emulation of a father-figure.


--
Adequacy has turned into a cesspool consisting of ... blubbering, superstitious fools arguing with smug, pseudointellectual assholes. -AR

 
You are getting old, elenchos (none / 0) (#23)
by Anonymous Reader on Tue Apr 16th, 2002 at 02:38:28 AM PST
You seem to blame other's persons fathers for everything. At first your tv psicology explanations were funny but now are getting repetitive and tired.

Go back to writting another Tolkien rant, stick to what you do best.





Ha ha ha! (none / 0) (#24)
by hauntedattics on Tue Apr 16th, 2002 at 07:38:34 PM PST
Your post was funny.

But what do I know? I'm drunk.

----




You say that like it's a bad thing. [n/t] (none / 0) (#25)
by because it isnt on Wed Apr 17th, 2002 at 09:51:38 AM PST

adequacy.org -- because it isn't

Nope. (none / 0) (#26)
by hauntedattics on Wed Apr 17th, 2002 at 10:22:31 AM PST
Maybe just not so wise for a Tuesday night. Ook.

Haunted and Hungover



 

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ® 2001, 2002, 2003 Adequacy.org. The Adequacy.org name, logo, symbol, and taglines "News for Grown-Ups", "Most Controversial Site on the Internet", "Linux Zealot", and "He just loves Open Source Software", and the RGB color value: D7D7D7 are trademarks of Adequacy.org. No part of this site may be republished or reproduced in whatever form without prior written permission by Adequacy.org and, if and when applicable, prior written permission by the contributing author(s), artist(s), or user(s). Any inquiries are directed to legal@adequacy.org.