Everybody's a c**ksucker

Stories

Diaries

Polls

Users

Web Adequacy.org

Home

About

Topics

Rejects

Abortions

This is an unofficial archive site only. It is no longer maintained. You can not post comments. You can not make an account. Your email will not be read. Please read this page or the footnote if you have questions.

Poll

Votes: 19

Everybody's a c**ksucker

Author:

alprazolam

Topic:

Diaries

Posted:

Oct 08, 2001

Comments:

This site wouldn't be so bad if the vast majority of people posting weren't c**ksucking idiots who deserve to be stabbed through the eye.

More diaries by alprazolam

	Low expectations
	right now
	Israel's planned genocide
	Anxiety
	Middle School
	Ethical Conundrum
	Ethical Conundrum II
	End the Pretense
	Sigh
	My online buddies
	Hey
	Posterity
	Found
	I chipped a tooth
	week before move
	Mock drafts

This especially includes people from slashdot who post about how great linux is. God damn some people are truly hopeless idiots.

[Editor's note, by dmg: edited to remove profanity. If this abuse of the adequacy diary system persists, I WILL yank your account. Consider yourself warned.]

	Please respect gays and women (4.25 / 4) (#1)
	by moriveth on Mon Oct 8th, 2001 at 02:07:57 PM PST

	alprazolam, I am angered by your use of the term "cocksuckers" to refer to the members of Adequacy in a deragatory fashion. I have no way of knowing what percentage of the Adequacy community is gay, bisexual, transgendered, or female; I would assume you have no way of knowing, either. Regardless, it is the height of immaturity to imply that there is anything abnormal or immoral about the act of oral sex. Your diary signifies a new low for intelligent discourse on Adequacy.

	obviously (4.75 / 4) (#2)
	by alprazolam on Mon Oct 8th, 2001 at 03:09:30 PM PST

	what I meant was people who start to suck dick but don't finish the job. Otherwise it couldn't possibly be considered an insult. You are obviously the homophobe to go assuming it in other people.

	Apologies (4.33 / 3) (#3)
	by moriveth on Mon Oct 8th, 2001 at 04:00:27 PM PST

	Glad to see I simply misunderstood your diary. Next time you're in San Francisco, drop me a line and we can go clubbing.

	You're kidding yourself. (3.66 / 3) (#5)
	by tkatchev on Mon Oct 8th, 2001 at 10:19:21 PM PST

	You're sorely deluded if you think that there is "nothing wrong" with oral sex. Sure, nobody is perfect, (we are all sinners) but at least you should be aware when you're doing something bad. Oral sex classfies as "bad". (Not as bad as most other stuff we do, IMO, but anyways.) -- Peace and much love...

	Remove your moral blindfold, sir (5.00 / 2) (#6)
	by moriveth on Tue Oct 9th, 2001 at 01:09:11 AM PST

	Oral sex classfies as "bad". A trenchant observation. I, alprazolam, and the rest of the gay, bisexual, transgendered, and female members of the Adequacy community will no doubt take your advice to heart, you Falwell-loving homophobic masturbator.

	Ha, ha :) (3.66 / 3) (#7)
	by tkatchev on Tue Oct 9th, 2001 at 04:08:21 AM PST

	Dude, I'm not homophobic. It's just that I'm grown up enough to realize that there is no intrinsic value in sexual gratification for the sake of sexual gratification. Oral sex is only "cool" and "exciting" if you're stuck with a closeted 14-yr-old's mentality. Oral sex stopped having a special "forbidden fruit" appeal for me after I turned 15. -- Peace and much love...

	sigh... (5.00 / 1) (#9)
	by moriveth on Tue Oct 9th, 2001 at 09:23:08 AM PST

	Would you kindly read my post and inform me where I state that oral sex is "fun" and "exciting"--implying that I am some middle school recruiter for the homosexuals. I responded to your ludicrous and unsupported assertion that it is intrinsically "bad," whatever that might mean, a position you have now sensibly abandonded.

	You're not a gk, are you??** (3.00 / 2) (#10)
	by tkatchev on Tue Oct 9th, 2001 at 09:40:31 AM PST

	Because you seem to be too dense to be a normal person. Oral sex is "bad" in the same way that eating sulfur or piercing your tongue is "bad". It's not a crime, but that doesn't mean that you should rush out and start doing it. Just because stupid people tell you it's "fun", doesn't mean you should start doing it. This applies to sex as well as to everything else. Amazing that people check their reasoning abilities at the door whenever sex is involved. -- Peace and much love...

	bait and switch (5.00 / 1) (#11)
	by moriveth on Tue Oct 9th, 2001 at 09:57:08 AM PST

	I sincerely apologize if I took what you initially wrote seriously: You're sorely deluded if you think that there is "nothing wrong" with oral sex. Sure, nobody is perfect, (we are all sinners) but at least you should be aware when you're doing something bad. Oral sex classfies as "bad". (Not as bad as most other stuff we do, IMO, but anyways.) Your most recent post implies that oral sex is tantamount to body piercings. Yet you use the word "sin" in your initial post, a term with considerably darker connotations. I especially object to the touch about oral sex being "not as bad as other stuff we do," which presumably includes the 9/11 terrorist attacks and the Holocaust. Again, if you were simply trolling, I apologize for my overreaction. If you were not, I would ask you to please take a long, hard look at what you write.

	Your problem. (3.00 / 2) (#13)
	by tkatchev on Tue Oct 9th, 2001 at 11:50:04 AM PST

	Your problem is that you have a poor grasp of what Christian terminology means. "Sin" does not carry "darker connotations". Chewing gum is a sin. Mild cussing is a sin. Making fun of your cat is a sin. Hell, we probably sin every minute. Sinning is just part of human life, you shouldn't be ashamed of it -- rather, learn to recognize it for what it is, and try to improve yourself. That is really the point of Christianity -- since we are all non-stop sinners, the only way to save yourself is to trust God and believe in the advice He gives you. Also, your references to the Holocaust and the WTC attacks are really a red herring. Christianity does not concern itself with the behaviour of large groups of people; as far as Christians are concerned, the only thing that matters is your personal salvation. The Holocaust and the WTC bombings weren't really such big sins on a personal scale -- the people physically perpetrating these acts are usually just stupid and deluded fucks. (Don't knee-jerk here. I'm not condoning atrocities, I'm just saying that you can't really judge how "bad" sombody sinned if that somebody is insane.) -- Peace and much love...

	chewing gum is not a "sin" either (5.00 / 2) (#14)
	by moriveth on Tue Oct 9th, 2001 at 12:38:09 PM PST

	I am not a Christian, nor is "sin" an exclusively Christian term. However, I do not think Christ or the Pope ever condemed chewing gum or making fun of cats (even if the latter has condemned oral sex). If you (like Pat Robertson and other fanatics) think the above offenses constitute a transgression of the law of God or even an offense against religious or moral law, fine. But allow me to disagree, and be aware that your views will be considered offensive by many.

	cock sucking & cunt licking wholesome & vi (5.00 / 3) (#15)
	by johnny ambiguous on Tue Oct 9th, 2001 at 02:20:34 PM PST

	Oral sex is only "cool" and "exciting" if you're stuck with a closeted 14-yr-old's mentality. I beg to differ. Oral sex is sweet cool exciting fun even during the second decade of one's wholesome, entirely non-adulterous marriage. Leave us devoutly hope it persists being so into the third. And there damn well is "intrinsic value in sexual gratification." Indeed, more than anything else in all the whole world, sexual gratification perfectly and ideally exemplifies "intrinsic value." Yours WD "Mr. Serious" K - WKiernan@concentric.net Getting into my Chevrolet Magic Fire, I drove slowly back to the office. - L. Rosen

	Sex is proper in a married, procreative relation (5.00 / 2) (#8)
	by Adam Rightmann on Tue Oct 9th, 2001 at 05:19:47 AM PST

	though I believe non-procreative sex is allowed in marriages where you've fulfilled your duty to increase the faithful, 5 or 6 children should do it. Everything else has varying degrees of sin. I thought I had already explained this. A. Rightmann

	I like them. (5.00 / 3) (#4)
	by elenchos on Mon Oct 8th, 2001 at 04:29:47 PM PST

	I don't understand why you don't like it when people from slasdot post linux propaganda here. My greatest fear for adequacy is if they ever stop coming. I think they're interesting to talk to. I would go to slashdot to talk to them, but there I get modded down for the simple crime of having a dialogue with a linux holy warrior. That wounds my ego. Here I can talk with them all day long and get modded up for it, which I need. The only danger with them is when they become angry and "hack" the site. I worry each time one of them posts if this poster is going to initiate the next DoS attack. This is why I've tried to make a habit of politely asking each one not to do it. No one else has ever thought of just asking them do not do it, and yet obviously it works. So I'm not sure why you are so unhappy, and why you are saying such terrible things like cunt and fuck and cocksucker. Especially cocksucker! DON'T SAY COCKSUCKER HERE! Even if you are talking about g**ks. What would Adequacy be like if we only had each other, and the lunix kids never stopped by? Would that really be better? I do, I do, I do --Bikini Kill

	Two Replies; Pick One (5.00 / 3) (#12)
	by egg troll on Tue Oct 9th, 2001 at 10:46:18 AM PST

	I have two possible replies to this, but I can't decide which to use. Your feedback is welcome. The first is what I'd use to reply if this was on some other "News for Nerds"-type site. It goes: "I am one of the many cocksuckers here on Adequacy. While in the Castro, please feel free to visit me in the men's room of Daddy's. I'm usually in the last stall wearing a black latex Nazi uniform. I keep my arm greased up to the elbow and call myself the Tower of Power." The alternate reply was going to be an Onion link. Apparently the Onion is now being served off a 56k modem, configured by specially trained chimps because its running slower than Jon Katz' synapses fire. Since I can't pull it up you'll just have to trust me that it was a hoot. >:\| Posting for the love of the baby Jesus....

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ® 2001, 2002, 2003 Adequacy.org. The Adequacy.org name, logo, symbol, and taglines "News for Grown-Ups", "Most Controversial Site on the Internet", "Linux Zealot", and "He just loves Open Source Software", and the RGB color value: D7D7D7 are trademarks of Adequacy.org. No part of this site may be republished or reproduced in whatever form without prior written permission by Adequacy.org and, if and when applicable, prior written permission by the contributing author(s), artist(s), or user(s). Any inquiries are directed to legal@adequacy.org.