|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
This is an unofficial archive site only. It is no longer maintained.
You can not post comments. You can not make an account. Your email
will not be read. Please read this
page or the footnote if you have questions. |
||||||||||
Recent research has shown that the average lifespans of domesticated
animals are up to 4 years less than those of their feral counterparts. The
findings of this research highlight the hypocrisy and selfishness of pet
owners - that these so-called animal lovers brutally and callously cut
short the lives of their four-legged companions.
Adequacy.org spoke to the scientist behind the research and asked, what can be done to rectify this widespread and socially acceptable form of barbarism?
|
|||||||||||||||
The findings of this research, published in the June issue of the
Journal of the American Association of Veterinary Science and
Associated Professions, are an unequivocal condemnation of pet owners.
The facts, presented below, make chilling reading. For example, the
average lifespan of a domesticated dog is four years less than that
of a similar dog living in the wild.
Dr. Victor O'Neill, the author of this work and a veterinary surgeon for over 25 years, explained that several factors are responsible for foreshortening the lives of domesticated animals. "Firstly, animals reared in a domestic environment are not exposed to the same pathogens during infancy as wild animals. Therefore, the immune systems of domesticated animals do not develop properly, which leads to a reduced resistance to disease in adulthood." "However, the main reason for these disturbing findings is that animals do not adapt to domestic life. Animals are simply unhappy when sharing a habitat with humans. Humans attempt to impose their value system upon animals and then punish the animals should they transgress this arbitrary set of rules of which they have no comprehension. These animals, enslaved by human tyrants, eventually lose the will to live, which results in their premature deaths." Following the publication of his research, O'Neill has formed a pressure group to lobby for a change in the law, outlawing pet ownership. In the short term, O'Neill believes that a change in people's attitudes is necessary. "Currently, pet ownership is seen as a harmless hobby and people are dependant on their companion animals. However, this research has shown that pet ownership is anything but harmless. People need to realise that it is a cruel institution that must be stopped." "There are many parallels between pet ownership and the practice of slavery that was widespread in the United States of America during the early part of the last century. Nowadays, the ownership of slaves is socially unacceptable and is rightly acknowledged as a barbaric practice. Pet ownership is exactly the same. I hope that people will come to realise that keeping domesticated animals is morally indefensible and that society will ostracize pet owners." However, O'Neill's viewpoint has been controversial and unpopular. "I have recieved innumerable death threats from pet owners. On one occassion my eight year-old daughter was kidnapped and physically assaulted by an enraged pet owner. Animal lovers are notorious for their emotional instability and they rely on their pet animals as a substitute for normal human relationships. My proposals to remove their emotional safety net are anathema to them and it is hardly surprising to see such an irrational reaction."
It is truly inspiring to meet a man such as O'Neill who is willing to risk
his personal safety in the fight for a righteous cause. It is indisputable
that pet ownership is a vile practice. Humanity will only ever be able to
consider itself an advanced civilisation when it outlaws this cruel
institution and treats the lesser species with proper respect. |