Adequacy front page
Stories Diaries Polls Users
Google

Web Adequacy.org
Home About Topics Rejects Abortions
This is an unofficial archive site only. It is no longer maintained. You can not post comments. You can not make an account. Your email will not be read. Please read this page or the footnote if you have questions.
 Hey qp!

 Author:  Topic:  Posted:
Sep 23, 2001
 Comments:

I thunk of you today when I got home from work, but I guess you weren't watching my cam. :*(

Oh well, here is what you missed! :D
diaries

More diaries by jin wicked
Greetings.
Link Button
Fish and Chips
Holy Jesus, what are these goddamn animals?
It's all about me.
Hello!
Hey BC!
My photos from Qu?bec!
Thanks everyone!
Thomas Kinkade: Insensitive Capitalist Bastard
Happy Forking Holidays!
Mundane Rambling
Happy Birthday



Um... (4.00 / 4) (#1)
by elenchos on Sun Sep 23rd, 2001 at 08:30:34 PM PST
Why am I looking at a picture of you?

I remember quite clearly that I clicked on my link to adequacy.org, and most assuredly did not click on a link to jinwicked's-excessive-picutes-of-herself.com. I have no link to any such site, and I'm pretty sure I never will. Make no mistake: if I ever do want to look at pictures of you, I know where to find them. How could I help knowing? Everyone ON THE WHOLE FUCKING INTERNET knows where do find pictures of you, whether they want to know or not.

So by going to some other site besides yours, such as adequacy, they are indicating that they DO NOT want to look at pictures of you.

Can I be any more clear about this? Adequacy is a respectable site. I come here for a certain something that you can't get anywhere else. Pictures of you are not that certain something, and I most certainly can get that somewhere else (jinwicked-me-me-me.com IIRC). I am not at that site. I am here. Here is NOT jinwicked-ad-nausaeum.com. Here is adequcay.org. See? Get it?

Fuck. K5 sucks. Now adeqacy has decided to suck to. Everything sucks. Everything is ruined now, for everybody. Forever. I can't believe this.

Fuck.


I do, I do, I do
--Bikini Kill

Awwww...poor baby! (4.00 / 2) (#2)
by jin wicked on Sun Sep 23rd, 2001 at 08:33:45 PM PST
I feel so bad for you, I really do! ^_^


"Ars longa, vita brevis...Art is long, life is short."

I knew you would fucking gloat. (3.00 / 2) (#3)
by elenchos on Sun Sep 23rd, 2001 at 08:49:43 PM PST
This sucks so much. What has happened to the world? Everything has just gone TOTALLY FUCKING WACK. Everything that every was worth a shit is now just smashed to pieces and it will never ever be the same again. Fuck. How could they have allowed this? What is wrong with them? ARE YOU ADEQUACY EDITORS ON CRACK? Nobody comes to adequacy to see a fucking picture of Jin Fucking Wicked! NOBODY! People come here to NOT see pictures of Jin Wicked. This is the most -- well, it WAS the most anti-jinwicked.com place in the whole universe. Couldn't you have at least not put it in the intro? Now I can't look at the diaries section AT ALL. This sucks. This sucks so fucking much.

Fuck.


I do, I do, I do
--Bikini Kill

It's okay (5.00 / 3) (#4)
by Setsoru on Sun Sep 23rd, 2001 at 08:56:25 PM PST
Take a lithium bath. Things are really not so bad. Jesus loves you. Jin_Wicked loves you. Besides we're all secretly in love with Jin_Wicked & cannot get enough pictures of her. Or was that enough preprocessed cheese? Is there a difference?

Damn. (5.00 / 2) (#6)
by nx01 on Sun Sep 23rd, 2001 at 09:01:38 PM PST
That's the most insightful, comforting thing I've read all day.


"Every time I look at the X window system, it's so fucking stupid; and part of me feels responsible for the worst parts of it."
-- James Gosling

 
Hey, it *was* just a text link... (5.00 / 2) (#5)
by jin wicked on Sun Sep 23rd, 2001 at 09:00:17 PM PST
One of the editors posted it as an actual image on the page. I had nothing to do with that. :)


"Ars longa, vita brevis...Art is long, life is short."

Oh yes. I blame them completely. (4.00 / 4) (#8)
by elenchos on Sun Sep 23rd, 2001 at 09:31:01 PM PST
I know already how you are. I know why you do... what you do. It is in your nature to be the way you are, and it can even be somewhat distracting and possibly amusing to condescend to watch you prance and caper for attention and validation. I don't think you could ever be held one hundred percent liable for any of the consequences of your actions. Any real damage depends on others enabling you, and in indulging your outbursts beyond a strictly prescribed set of rational boundaries.

Real damage, such as defacing the entire adequacy diary section, requires the complicity -- the culpability -- of an adequacy.org editor. A sacred trust was bestowed, and a sacred trust has been defiled, at the cost of one editor's honor, and indeed that editor's immortal soul, in the name of Holy Christ Almighty.

What a black day. What evil times we live in. What depths we have plunged to. O torment me no more, wicked, wicked Earth! Must I claw out mine eyes? Must I drink from the cup of the poison pearl and end forever this deluge of woes piled high upon woes?

Fie. Bloody hell, we are lost. Lost, each and every one of us, who were once in such a state of grace. Black times are upon us, and all hope is lost.

O TORMENT ME NO MORE!!! Fuck.


I do, I do, I do
--Bikini Kill

I have an idea! (5.00 / 2) (#9)
by jin wicked on Sun Sep 23rd, 2001 at 09:35:14 PM PST
Go back to k5. I don't post there anymore! :D


"Ars longa, vita brevis...Art is long, life is short."

 
I would just like to say (none / 0) (#12)
by jsm on Sun Sep 23rd, 2001 at 11:00:45 PM PST
that the one and only reason I am not deleting this rant immediately is that I think it's quite funny.

... the worst tempered and least consistent of the adequacy.org editors
... now also Legal department and general counsel, adequacy.org

Well, of course. (none / 0) (#18)
by elenchos on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 09:07:27 AM PST
Why post anything unless it is funny? For the common good of Man? No point in that, since civilization is pretty much doomed now and there is nothing anyone can do to save us.

So I merely observed that yet another vain image of Jin Wicked, blatantly defacing the entire diaries page was NOT FUNNY in any way. Something had to be done.

And now that the picture has moved out of the intro and been put out of the view of the non-Wickedist public, we are all a little better off. Still doomed of course, but the rate of acceleration of our lunge towards destruction isn't increasing quite so fast.


I do, I do, I do
--Bikini Kill

Defacing?! (none / 0) (#19)
by iat on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 09:19:18 AM PST
How can you say that Jin's image was defacing the diaries page? Jin's good looks have survived unblemished even though captured by a grainy webcam and have vastly improved the aesthetic appearance of Adequacy.org, in a way that our resident artfag can only dream of! And Ms. Wicked's smile in the aforementioned picture exhibits an enigmatic quality not seen since Leonardo da Vinci's lifetime. It cannot be disputed that Jin is the Mona Lisa of the Internet Era.

Truly, Adequacy.org has been enriched by the Jin's presence on the diary page. In fact, I think we should have a picture of Jin Wicked on every page of Adequacy, to remind us all of her timeless beauty.


Adequacy.org - love it or leave it.

steady on now (none / 0) (#21)
by jsm on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 09:51:08 AM PST
I think, speaking from the legal department, that you have to remember that practically 100% of the images of Jin Wicked on the internet are copyright Jin Wicked. We have to respect that copyright.

Furthermore, there is already a "portal" for Jin Wicked Enthusiasts, i.e. jinwicked.com. I don't think there's any point in us here at adequacy trying to to "enter that space". We'd be on a hiding to nothing.

... the worst tempered and least consistent of the adequacy.org editors
... now also Legal department and general counsel, adequacy.org

Possible solution (none / 0) (#22)
by iat on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 10:03:46 AM PST
Perhaps we could use some of our venture capital money to purchase jinwicked.com, then we could legally use as much of Jin's material as we desired? I shall speak to the finance department and request that they purchase shares in jinwicked.com.


Adequacy.org - love it or leave it.

bad news (none / 0) (#24)
by jsm on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 10:41:49 AM PST
I'm afraid that the venture capital has already been pissed up against the wall by an as yet unidentified staff member, who apparently used it to build up the massive bukkake collection which periodically brings the server to a grinding, spermy halt.

Sorry an' all that. You try auditing the books from 5000 miles away with a dodgy email connection some time, I ask you ....

... the worst tempered and least consistent of the adequacy.org editors
... now also Legal department and general counsel, adequacy.org

Problem solved! (none / 0) (#27)
by iat on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 01:05:54 PM PST
I wonder if we could use our substantial capital investment in bukkake infrastructure to our economic advantage? I have heard from a reliable but undisclosed source that there is a deficit of good websites catering for his particular *cough* interest. I also notice that the registration on the domain BukkakeWorld.com has recently expired and the domain is now vacant.

I propose that we rebrand Adequacy.org under the Bukkake World banner, and start selling access to our definitive archive of the bukkake genre. With the proceeds, we could afford to purchase the rights to original content provided by jinwicked.com.


Adequacy.org - love it or leave it.

One thing that I cannot understand is (none / 0) (#30)
by Anonymous Reader on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 01:24:23 PM PST
Why Jin does not have her own icon? Indeed, she deserves her own section! Indeed, her own web page! er, never mind...

--
Griswald

 
Dear Mr IAT (none / 0) (#32)
by bc on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 01:32:19 PM PST
Please be aware that your undisclosed source is not only an investor in the industry, but has acted in it on many occasions too, by his own admission. The wealth of experience he can bring to the table, the liquid currency of widom that flows from his every pore overwhelming us all with thick, gooey knowledge, can only help our websites efforts to be among the cream of the industry.


♥, bc.

 
hello! (none / 0) (#29)
by Anonymous Reader on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 01:19:20 PM PST
I just wanted to point out that you weren't entirely correct. Normally I wouldn't give this site a second thought, being the bastion of republicanism and proprietory code that it is, but ever since Jin left K5, I have basically dropped them like a smelly fish and obediently followed Jin over here. Although of course I have no illusions that I am anything but a mere blip on her troll radar, I still come here at _least_ once a day to see what is happenning in the life of Jin. I was then of course surprised and pleased that she would offer to qpt (and by happy accident of open access, me) a brief glimpse of her in all her shoulderesque beauty and charm, with a smile and pose straight from the classical era. While I do try to make sense of her lifes philosophy yet often if not always fail, I will allow you this, your post was indeed in err. I, and surely dozens of others, are only here for Jin.

Now, if you would, kindly step aside. You're blocking my view.

--
Griswald


 
What I want to know is... (5.00 / 1) (#7)
by jin wicked on Sun Sep 23rd, 2001 at 09:02:37 PM PST
if you aren't qpt, why are you clicking on that link? :)


"Ars longa, vita brevis...Art is long, life is short."

 
I see (5.00 / 1) (#10)
by qp on Sun Sep 23rd, 2001 at 09:47:57 PM PST
If you want to talk to me, do not use a diary entry. It is not the appropriate venue for private conversation and I am sure that you are resourceful enough to find some other way of contacting me.

On the other hand, if you wanted merely to laugh at my expense, I do hope you have enjoyed yourself. Now please leave me alone.

--------

"Hey qp, where are you? You missed the nudie shots about three minutes ago!" -- Jin Wicked
And so, I died.

Well... (5.00 / 1) (#11)
by jin wicked on Sun Sep 23rd, 2001 at 10:00:01 PM PST
I figured since you'd probably just paste anything I had to say to your public diary anyway, I would just cut to the chase and save you the trouble.


"Ars longa, vita brevis...Art is long, life is short."

 
ATTN Jin Wicked - a suggestion (none / 0) (#13)
by otak on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 04:11:29 AM PST
Hey Jin!

I've just been over at the other place trying to read your famous diary, but it looks like scoop has expired them or something! There's only one diary left! I think I speak for all the members of the adequacy community when I say that I just can't hear enough about you, so obviously this came as a disappointment.

So my suggestion is this: now that you're over here at adequacy, why not repost your old kuro5hin diaries on a regular (daily?) basis. You could accompany each repost with anecdotes about the discussion that followed and comments from the Jin that you are today. New readers would be brought up to speed, Jin-wise, while older readers could revel in the nostalgia. You could even try and get `Jin Classique' posted to the front page - I think everyone would agree that it's `news for grownups' - but you'd probably have to talk to one of the editors about that.

Anyway - keep it up. I'm looking forward to hearing more great 'Jin-formation' about you! :)


welcome to new readers (none / 0) (#14)
by jsm on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 04:38:50 AM PST
In general, adequacy.org tends to frown on "recycled content. So I don't think we'll be seeing this any time soon.

By the way, having read some of the general tenor of these comments, I think it is hardly fair to criticise Jin for being a self-publicist (after all, she has pictures to sell) when communista remains more or less unchastised for the same offence, with far fewer mitigating circumstances.

jsm, who doesn't believe for a minute that that is a genuine photo, but thinks that Jin is rather pretty.

... the worst tempered and least consistent of the adequacy.org editors
... now also Legal department and general counsel, adequacy.org

It is genuine! (none / 0) (#16)
by bc on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 05:19:57 AM PST
I helped her pick it, from live webcam stream. Much fun that was.


♥, bc.

I found it becoming (none / 0) (#23)
by Anonymous Reader on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 10:10:37 AM PST
And not just because I be c... er, forget that bad joke.

Clearly an image of style and grace. Were I young and beautiful, I'd be in porn, so please folks, take note of Jin's sense of good taste given her obvious physical attributes, she could be doing much worse (or better, depending on your value system). Thats all for now!


 
are you sure about that? (none / 0) (#25)
by alprazolam on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 10:43:46 AM PST
jsm ... thinks that Jin is rather pretty.

she kind of looks like a muppet to me. must be the webcam software.

Bah, it's a most fetching picture (none / 0) (#26)
by Peter Johnson on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 10:51:08 AM PST
It's grainy, but the playful, inviting look is clearly visible. Utterly charming.
--Peter
Are you adequate?

 
pff (5.00 / 1) (#31)
by otak on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 01:31:26 PM PST
By the way, having read some of the general tenor of these comments, I think it is hardly fair to criticise Jin for being a self-publicist...when communista remains more or less unchastised for the same offence, with far fewer mitigating circumstances.
communista isn't on adequacy. Jin is.

 
Good idea! (none / 0) (#15)
by iat on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 04:42:06 AM PST
I have just been on the phone to Adequacy's legal team, and they have assured me that no expense will be spared in purchasing the rights to syndicate re-runs of Jin's diary here on Adequacy.

We're hoping that Jin's diary could provide the basis for a revamped Adequacy Premium Section, where we can try to recoup the enormous costs of running this website, by allowing you to pay for that great Adequacy content that you know and love! We also hope to promote the diary by running a series of Jin-based competitions and to start stocking a range of Offical Jin Wicked Merchandise in the Adequacy Boutique. I'm sure you'll agree that these are exciting times for Adequacy.org!.


Adequacy.org - love it or leave it.

hrmmp? (none / 0) (#17)
by jsm on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 08:01:03 AM PST
I have just been on the phone to Adequacy's legal team, and they have assured me that no expense will be spared in purchasing the rights to syndicate re-runs of Jin's diary here on Adequacy.

That's not exactly what I said, love, the legal team.

... the worst tempered and least consistent of the adequacy.org editors
... now also Legal department and general counsel, adequacy.org

 
Sorry. (none / 0) (#33)
by jin wicked on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 01:57:46 PM PST
I had Inoshiro delete all my old diary entries because they were likewise removed from my homepage, since I've quit journaling altogether.


"Ars longa, vita brevis...Art is long, life is short."

You Wretched Woman (none / 0) (#34)
by Peter Johnson on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 02:03:37 PM PST
Quit keeping a journal? How could you?

Don't you realize that many of us live to read about you and your life?

I hope you'll at least write some articles for us. We just can't get enough of you.

Without sarcasm,
--Peter
Are you adequate?

I already told bc (none / 0) (#36)
by jin wicked on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 02:39:51 PM PST
that I would. The reason I quit journaling is mostly because I lost interest in it, but I also want to concentrate my excessive typing towards getting the Essays section up on my site. I'm writing content for that pretty much, but they're essays/articles/whatever and I told bc that I wouldn't mind submitting one of them here if it's relevant or you'd like to post it.


"Ars longa, vita brevis...Art is long, life is short."

point of clarification (none / 0) (#38)
by Peter Johnson on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 02:55:05 PM PST
I wrote that before I learned that you were a <a href="http://goatse.cx">user friendly</a> fan.

I take it all back. I want you off this site. Yesterday. I am calling a vote from the other editors and expect results soon.

--Peter
Are you adequate?

 
Should these images be put in the adult section? (none / 0) (#20)
by Adam Rightmann on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 09:23:05 AM PST
While the one image is not particulary risque, it does allude to more adult type pictures. Perhaps they should be moved to adult section that excludes minors nad those not wanting to sin (unless we move to ban all these types of images and topics, not likely considering the sort of editors we have).


A. Rightmann

Clarification (none / 0) (#28)
by bc on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 01:18:46 PM PST
A Rightman and certain other editors would like to see adequacy.org pushed towards a more conservative morality. However, some of us believe in freedom of speech here, except trolling, which doesn't count as speech at all, and so all readers can be rest assured that the conservative elements will never gain the upper hand.

I am dissapointed that my fellow editor Mr Rightman feels this way, but I understand his fearful attitude towards modern sexuality. I can only urge that all users show the proper restraint when talking about their personal lives, so that we don't need to sort this issue out with the usual argie-bargie, splits, and internecine strife such personal indulgence would necessitate. This diary sailed extremely close to the wind, and although I found it a truly poignant and beautiful entry others are offended by the naked flesh on show. Please be considerate towards the feelings of Rightman and others.

Thank you.


♥, bc.

Horse hockey (none / 0) (#35)
by seventypercent on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 02:36:24 PM PST
A Rightman and certain other editors would like to see adequacy.org pushed towards a more conservative morality.

"Conservative morality?" You are repeating yourself.

What other sort of morality is there? "Leftivist morality?"

There is no morality in leftivistism; the only guidance that it offers is "do whatever makes you feel good" and "do whatever you think is appropriate at the time." That is not morality; that is relativism. What you meant to say is that we "would like to see adequacy.org pushed towards morality." It would have been easier to type that way, as well.

--
Red-blooded patriots do not use Linux.

Extremism (none / 0) (#37)
by bc on Mon Sep 24th, 2001 at 02:48:25 PM PST
There is no such thing as absolute morality. Everything is relative, there is really no such thing as right or wrong except that which we agree upon as a secular society.

Therefore you are right to say thet there is no real 'leftivist' morality. Every person is an individual, free to make their own choices and grow in their own ways.

I mean, haven't you heard of postmodernism, moral relativity and such basic concepts? Probably not, you clutch your tablets with the zeal of the close minded. People like you caused WWI and WWII.

As long as we follow our own morality, that is enough. We have nobody to please but ourselves, ultimately.


♥, bc.

 

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ® 2001, 2002, 2003 Adequacy.org. The Adequacy.org name, logo, symbol, and taglines "News for Grown-Ups", "Most Controversial Site on the Internet", "Linux Zealot", and "He just loves Open Source Software", and the RGB color value: D7D7D7 are trademarks of Adequacy.org. No part of this site may be republished or reproduced in whatever form without prior written permission by Adequacy.org and, if and when applicable, prior written permission by the contributing author(s), artist(s), or user(s). Any inquiries are directed to legal@adequacy.org.