The latest craze in child exploitation by men filled with unmitigated evil is to skirt the letter of the law, while defiling its spirit, by photographing young girls fully clothed, yet unmistakably sexualized. This question has been answered in pedantic detail elsewhere. Suffice it to say that all adults of even the most minimal moral character know porn when they see it, and the absence of literal nudity does nothing to change the fact that child sexual exploitation is child sexual exploitation. Anyone who has a big problem understanding that should very seriously think about suicide, considering the alternative will be living with the guilt of raping a 6 or 7 year old girl some day. I'd rather be dead, I know that.

So how does this relate to Kate, now 18 years old?

The unalterable fact about her and her adorable (I said adorable, not pretty, not sexy) twin sister Ashley, is that they are both forever writ into the American national consciousness as children. They are "those cute kids from that one TV show." That's who they are in everyone's mind, and this universal typcasting is as much a fact as is the fact that men buy videos of prancing clothed five-year-olds to get their sexual jollies, the fuckers, and for no other reason.

This means that when you get your sexual jump charge from a Kate photo, you are, in your mind getting off from oogling a child's body. You know damn well you feel like you are getting away with something, don't you? You goddamn freak, you sicko. Who do you think you're fooling, anyway?

Adequacy.org is on to you, you child molester. The jig is up, so get off that downward path while you still can -- and don't think you can check out the uglier sister, either, freako. She's a kid too, and always will be, in your heart of hearts. They're both kids and you know it.

God help you if you ever have a daughter, that's all I have to say.